THE ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTICAL ERRORS MADE BYSTUDENTS’ OF TBI IAIN BENGKULUIN WRITINGTHESIS ABSTRACTS (A Content Analysis on The Students’ S1 Thesis Abstracts of TBI IAIN Bengkulu Graduated at March 2018 Period)

OKTISA, LIA (2019) THE ANALYSIS OF SYNTACTICAL ERRORS MADE BYSTUDENTS’ OF TBI IAIN BENGKULUIN WRITINGTHESIS ABSTRACTS (A Content Analysis on The Students’ S1 Thesis Abstracts of TBI IAIN Bengkulu Graduated at March 2018 Period). Other thesis, Iain Bengkulu.

Preview

Text THESIS LIA.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Lia Oktisa. (2019). The Analysis of Syntactical Errors Made By Students’ of TBI IAIN Bengkulu In Writing Thesis Abstract (A Content Analysis on The Students’ S1 Thesis Abstracts of TBI IAIN Bengkulu Graduated at March 2018 Period). Thesis. English Education Study Program. Tarbiyah and Tadris Faculty. Advisors : 1. Riswanto, Ph.D, II. Detti Lismayanti, M. Hum. The aims of the research were to investigate thesyntactical errors, the dominantsyntactical errors, and the factors that influence the students‘syntactical errorsin writing thesis abstracts in TBI IAIN Bengkulu.This research used content analysis with descriptive qualitative approach. The source of data in this research were the students’ thesis abstract of TBI IAIN Bengkulu graduated at March 2018 period. The data were collected through data sheet. The result showed that there were ten syntactical errorsmade by under graduate students in writing their thesis abstract. First syntactical errorswas students’ problem in noun. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract it had 20 syntactical errors in noun. Second, student’s syntactical errorsin noun phrase. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract it had 8 syntactical errors in noun phrase. Third, students’ syntactical errorswas in verb. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract it had 132 syntactical errorsin verb. Fourth, students’ syntactical errorswas in determiner. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract it had 12 syntactical errors in determiners. Fifth, students’ syntactical errorswas in determiner phrase. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract, the researcher found 1 syntactical error in determiner phrase. Sixth, students’ syntactical errorswas in pronoun. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract, the researcher found 3 syntactical errors in pronoun. Seventh, students’ syntactical errorswas in tenses marker. From 33 data of students’ thesis abstract it had 6 syntactical errorsin tenses marker. Eight, students’ syntactical errorswas in auxiliary. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract, the researcher found 2 syntactical errors in auxiliary. Ninth, students’ syntactical errorsin complementizer. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract, it was found 3 syntactical errors in complementizer, and the last was students’syntactical errors in preposition. From 33 data of students' thesis abstract, it was found 7 syntactical errors in preposition. The dominant syntactical errors made by the students was syntactical errorsinusing verbs. Then, the factors that influence students’ syntactical errors were mother tongue interference and ineffective traits of learning such as faulty application of rules and unawareness of the restrictions of rules that covers overgeneralization, ignorance of rule restrictions, incomplete application of the rules, and false concept hypothesized. Key words : Syntactical Errors, Abstract

Actions (login required)

View Item